This is one of a series of posts on the 39 articles, the foundation of anglican faith. I’ll be attempting to explore the meaning and scriptural basis to each article and looking at the truth under attack in the modern church.
There is but one living and true God, everlasting, without body, parts or passions; of infinite power, wisdom and goodness; the Maker and Preserver of all things both visible and invisible. And in the unity of this Godhead there be three Persons, of one substance, power and eternity; the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost.
Article 1
The anglican articles of religion start where they should, with the doctrine of God. Or maybe they shouldn’t, the Westminster Confession of Faith begins with the doctrine of scripture and probably rightly so, been as one can only understand God (albeit an incomplete understanding) through his word in which he has revealed himself. So perhaps we should go and read Article 6 before starting back here, or maybe just keep reading and get to article 6 in a couple of weeks time.
So, as I’ve already mentioned, this is a very good place to start. Understanding the nature of the triune eternal God goes a long way towards having a right view of him and consequently ourselves and especially our sin. It may be a little like stating the obvious to suggest that upon this truth everything rests (even, I dare say, scripture), but I thought I might explain a little of how this is true.
If God is not infinitely powerful, wise or good then we are doomed because he either cannot, does not know how or will not save us. If God is not triune then how could the divine Christ take the punishment of a Holy God? If God is not triune, we cannot pray, because Christ and the Father are in heaven, and not here to hear us. If God does not preserve all things then man is able by his own strength to do some things good (otherwise this world would be much much worse). If God is not the living and true God then we have no reason to trust his word. The list goes on…
Let’s go to Colossians 1 to see the doctrine of the trinity. We already know that the Father & the Spirit were at work in creation, from Genesis 1, or you will know now that you’ve gone and read it.
He has delivered us from the domain of darkness and transferred us to the kingdom of his beloved Son, in whom we have redemption, the forgiveness of sins.
He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation. For by him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities—all things were created through him and for him. And he is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church. He is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, that in everything he might be preeminent.
For in him all the fullness of God was pleased to dwell, and through him to reconcile to himself all things, whether on earth or in heaven, making peace by the blood of his cross.
Colossians 1:13-20 (ESV)
We see that all things were created for and through Christ in verse 16. But in fact we see an even bigger pointer in verse 19, “For in him all the fullness of God was pleased to dwell“, Christ is fully God (we’ll look at how that’s under attack next post) and there is only one God, as I’m sure you remember from reciting your 10 commandments.
Finally, the truth under attack. There are the obvious ways this truth is under attack, Unitarianism, Islam, Jehovah’s Witnesses, the very self-centred beliefs of the world we live in, but I think that there are probably two major attacks on this in the church at the moment.
The first is Open Theism. This suggests that God not only does not know the future, but that he can be thwarted in his attempts to carry his plan to fruition. I may be grossly simplifying and I know that open theists will still contend that God is powerful, just not infinitely so, and not sovereign over the things he has created. Believing this would rob me of any certainty of my future glorification on the last day, and leaves me clinging to rags. How can I look to the future of Philippians 3:20-21 if I cannot be certain it will happen, or contain me?
Secondly, something that many who call themselves christian seem to want to do is change the character of God to fit how they want to see him. Perhaps the way I said it is a little harsh, it’s more like wanting to make God more socially acceptable. Among these are Rob Bell and Brian Maclaren who both try to move away from the idea of a powerful God who’s goodness is inextricably linked to his judgement and vengeance to an inanely nice God who sounds like limp handshake. I would urge the reader who is persuaded by these men to heed Paul’s words in 2 Timothy and “not be ashamed of the testimony of our Lord” (2 Tim 1:8) and also realise that it is a sign of the times that people turn away from the truth (2 Tim 4:3-4).
In a recent article, the prominent atheist Christopher Hitchins claimed that atheism was morally superior because it makes conclusions following the evidence despite not necessarily liking them. I would like to suggest that as a christian I do not believe article 1 because I like it (though I do) or because it’s the Church’s stance or what I was taught from a young age but because it is true and the earth and scripture testify to it.
So then, brothers, stand firm and hold to the traditions that you were taught by us, either by our spoken word or by our letter.
2 Thessalonians 2:15 (ESV)